top of page

Are There Objective Morals? Where Do They Come From?

"If God does not exist, then objective moral values and duties do not exist" ~William Lane Craig

Written by Vivienne Juan, Associate Elect Partner

Where do morals and ethics come from?

This is always one question that stumps my friends, especially those that don’t have an appreciation for the reality of God. I must admit, I was once one of them too.


At some points in my life I identified as atheist, and at others as “spiritual but not religious”, but either way, I still deeply believed in human rights. I mean, I even worked a brief stint at Amnesty International, where I fervently studied my little booklet on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ready to tackle any objection with my new activist zeal.


But where does this moral connection come from? What is the objective moral code that underpins our rights to human decency, dignity, and purpose, as well as our duty and responsibility to uphold these as valuable and sacred?


In this video, William Lane Craig posits that such an objective moral code and its attendant values and duties do not exist without the objective source of morals: God.



The Proof for Objective Morals

Do objective morals exist? Or are they subjective and susceptible to change? Are they different for me than they are for you? How can we prove this?


One thought experiment that made this very clear for me, involved a simple question about the Holocaust. Would a repeat of Nazism and the atrocities at Auschwitz - where over 6 million Jewish people were murdered - ever be acceptable in America, for example? Or would it perhaps be okay if it were perpetrated against Muslims? How about if it was to happen to you next week?


History gives us the answer. Injustice has happened in America, against Japanese immigrants. It has happened against Muslims. And never, ever, no matter how strong the mob was or how long they had power, never have these kinds of abomination been allowed to last. Anything immoral is unsustainable.


Needless to say, I came to the conclusion that genocide is objectively and universally immoral, regardless of country, culture, race, religion, or place in time, past, present, or future. Hopefully, you came to the same conclusion as well.


So morals are not relative, variable, or limited to any one person, place, or time. There is such a thing as an objective, highest human ideal. But how do we know they are attributable to one, singular, and Christian, God?


This was demonstrated beautifully for me in a talk by Dr Andy Bannister at a Genexis event that I attended in London last year. I’ll attempt to share a short, summarised sequence of reasoning for you here, however, you might also be interested in watching a video version from him on YouTube.


The Moral Argument for God

The proposition is this: If we believe that human rights are objective and inalienable, then we can judge a society upholding them as good, and one which fails those rights, is bad. If there is objective good and bad, as we have established with the Holocaust example, then defending the good and denouncing the bad is a dignified, upstanding purpose.


That purpose (stay with me, here) gives us a sense of duty and responsibility, which suggests value. Value in the people we protect, value in us for protecting them, and value in the moral code that is validated by our actions. Lots of value is what I’m saying!


Now where there is value, there is always a price. Be it time, money, or effort, nothing comes for free; everything has a price. What is the price of our humanity? Of the human race? Who thinks we are valuable enough to pay for?! And the answer to that is God - He paid the ultimate price when his son, Christ, died on the cross for our sins.


That’s how much we are worth, and that’s why our human rights - and the morals they are based on - are God-given. Every day I improve my desire and ability to treat myself like I do matter, like my friends and family are indeed valuable, and that innocent children drinking toxic pathogenic water, despite being half a world away, still have intrinsic moral value, and deserve dignity, love, and care. My previously nihilistic, nothing-is-connected-and-nothing-matters mindset couldn’t refute that.


READ MORE:

Our indifference is allowing our children to suffer painfully and unnecessarily




Visit our mentoring and coaching page to learn how you can make the most of your God-given human rights, or join one of our support groups or response forums to find out how you can help or be helped!

To exercise your moral duty to respond, register your interest in how you can help a child to receive clean drinking water, by visiting our Christian Response Forum website.


Have a question? To send me feedback or share your thoughts, please do get in touch and drop me an email— I’ll be happy to hear from you.


186 views15 comments

Recent Posts

See All

15 Comments


Anthony Antoine
Anthony Antoine
Mar 04, 2022

This argument is central to the quality of our lives, to not take this seriously…then another Holocaust is on the cards. Playing with these critical aspect of life and living, you really are playing with life and death of us all. Great article Vivienne

Like

Diane Cubitt
Diane Cubitt
Mar 04, 2022

Thank you so much Viv, writing this article could not have been easy. It is something that I have struggled with so much in the past, our God given rights as human beings. It does not matter what colour our skin is, it does not matter if we are fat, thin, wear glasses or not, we are at the end of the day, human beings. I think the most saddest thing is when a child first gets called a bad name just because of something that is different, they don't see anything like that in their friends. God does not see us in that way, he sees his children, his creation, he sent his son to us, who he allowed…

Like

Jai Singh
Jai Singh
Mar 04, 2022

It’s really fascinating that William Lane Craig was saying that this is the biggest argument that resonates with young people. That there are objective moral values.

Like

Olivia Humphries
Olivia Humphries
Mar 04, 2022

Wow... This along with the videos is a powerful read! Thank you Viv! I really enjoyed listening to Dr Andy Bannister here as he explains that talking about human, inherent dignity is basically impossible if you're an atheist as human rights are based on human dignity and human value because it you take those things to their cause... their roots... = God every time! When you're truly open and seeking truth, absolute truth...(and ask this to yourself) you realise the reason one wouldn't want to believe in God is because of a conflict of interest. For me reflecting on Seeking First The Kingdom of God, aka The Highest Human ideal in everything we do.....just imagining a world where everyone was…

Like

Mel Francis
Mel Francis
Mar 04, 2022

Thank you for this article Viv. I appreciate the arguments that you put forward here about the moral argument because ultimately, horrible things like the Holocaust do happen but history shows they aren't sustained and upheld in any country but the fact that they AREN'T sustained, because life is being destroyed shows us that life has value. I don't believe there's any point in history that, evolutionarily speaking, someone went "oh wait, if we kill people then we don't have anyone to procreate with to carry on our species, maybe we should keep some people alive", that's nonsense. We didn't "learn" to not kill eachother, we know it's wrong and treat it as wrong because of the morality given to…

Like

Subscribe to our Newsletter - Don't miss out on new articles!

Thanks for subscribing to our Lighthouse Community Newsletter!

bottom of page